destinationopf.blogg.se

However android device is not a preffered device to run Fallout since device itself needs to bee pretty powerfull (at least quad core 1,4GHz 2GB RAM and a efficient High-end graphic chip) especially the graphic chip is not good. So if you discover you have the original Mac release then consider an OS 9 partition. I think OS 9 is a free download from Apple now, if not try OWC: Mac-sales. Have installed on PPC systems with 10.1, 10.2 to 10.5. Have to adjust screen resolution on LCD wide screens to get acceptable picture.ġ.2.1 won't work on my next Mac, should be an Intel. 1.2.1 was ported when cathode ray tubes were the norm. Haven't tried forcing FO into a resolution native to it's original design when launching it. Your screen shot shows a radical resolution problem, not sure if I remember a similar one mentioned in the old Macplay trouble shooting data.ĭoes your OS 10.5.5 on an Intel Mac say it's an OS 9 app or just a PPC app? PPC app should work if Unix based - or not. IF you got the Unix based originally set up for OS 10.1 and up, and have this botched resolution, then you got a question worthy of Macplay if they still do active support.Ĭonfused, last time I Googled Macplay that site didn't mention older games,Īnd the same Google list had an IGN site with all the old Macplay game info. If you find a way to open FO1 in a window or box itself in it's originally designed resolution let us know.įinally, if you OS 10.5.5 (Intel) claims this ver. Of course a technically savvy user can retrieve the underlying files, but this purportedly puts it under the legal framework of "broadcasting" rather than "copying", which is supposed to somehow limit legal remedies available to copyright owners.1.2.1 is OS 9 then the problem may be worthy of the Apple Discussion site.

running a game in an in-browser emulator at but not providing download links.

I suppose the implicit promise is that IA would demand the same in a lawsuit.Ģ) Only allow access to some works via "streaming", e.g. Apparently, a whole goddamn lot of copyrights have hazy ownership thanks to corporate mergers/dissolutions/reorganizations being messy, but the claimed owners are rarely called on it. There are two prongs to the strategy:ġ) Disable access to works upon request, but only after challenging the requesting party to substantiate the claim that they represent the actual copyright owner.

If I remember correctly (disclaimer: it's been a while since I read about this, and IANAL), they don't get permission in advance, but rather take steps to make themselves harder to attack legally.